Engraved by H.
Robinson from the drawing at Windsor
Dutch Renaissance Humanist and Biblical
Scholar
DESIDERIUS ERASMUS was eighteen years
older than Luther, and stood at the height of his fame when the
reformer began his work. He differed from him as Jerome differed
from Augustine, or Eusebius from Athanasius. Erasmus was
essentially a scholar, Luther a reformer; the one was absorbed
in literature, the other in religion. Erasmus aimed at
illumination, Luther at reconstruction; the former reached the
intellect of the educated, the latter touched the heart of the
people. Erasmus labored for freedom of thought, Luther for
freedom of conscience. Both had been monks, Erasmus against his
will, Luther by free choice and from pious motives; and both
hated and opposed monkery, but the former for its ignorance and
bigotry, the latter for its self-righteousness and obstruction
of the true way to justification and peace. Erasmus followed
maxims of worldly wisdom; Luther, sacred principles and
convictions. The one was willing, as he confessed, to sacrifice
“a part of the truth for the peace of the church,” and his
personal comfort; the other was ready to die for the gospel at
any moment. Erasmus was a trimmer and timeserver, Luther every
inch a moral hero. [from Philip Schaff's “History of the
Christian Church”]